Prince Harry's astonishing 'dark' claim connected to Princess Diana's tragic death In a bombshell interview after the Court of Appeal upheld a ruling to strip him and his family of taxpayer-funded security, Prince Harry made a number of astonishing claims Prince Harry says he can't see a world where his wife and children will visit the UK and asks for reconciliation with his family (Image: BBC ) Prince Harry made a startling revelation linked to the tragic demise of his mother, Princess Diana, following the loss of his court case fighting for security protection for his family when in the UK. Following a judgement that upheld the decision to strip him of permanent taxpayer-funded security in the UK, the Duke of Sussex disclosed in an intense 30-minute interview that his father King Charles "won't speak to me because of this security stuff" but said he hoped to reconcile with his family. ‌ After losing his appeal case and now facing a £1.5million legal bill, Harry declared he wouldn't bring his family back to the UK and ominously suggested that "some people want history to repeat itself, which is pretty dark", referencing Princess Diana's fatal crash in Paris in 1997. ‌ Read more Buckingham Palace responds to Prince Harry's interview about King after court loss The Prince pointed out former PMs receive lifelong protection, adding "those rules were in place due to the 'reputational impact of the UK if that person or those people are injured on UK soil.' He added "but apparently, for me, that doesn't matter.... I have been singled out." Article continues below Harry said he believes he also deserves equal treatment for his "35 years service to his country, two tours of Afghanistan, and the threats and risks to my life." An emotional Harry launched a scathing attack on the Royal family during the interview, alleging that Buckingham Palace tried to coerce him and Meghan into staying within the institution by threatening to remove their personal protection. The Duke of Sussex, in a move for familial peace, has expressed his desire for reconciliation, noting, "I would love reconciliation with my family. As I said, life is precious. ‌ "I don't know how much longer my father has, you know, he won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile." However, he acknowledged: "If they don't want that, that's entirely up to them". Yet, the Duke had to concede that his tell-all book may have damaged some relationships beyond repair: "Some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book". ‌ Reflecting on the outcome, he conveyed to the BBC: "Obviously, (I'm) pretty, pretty gutted about the decision. I was born into this position. It wasn't a choice. I've served my country for 35 years. I believe that I am still continuing to serve my country." He also noted: "For the time being, it's impossible for me to take my family back to the UK safely." In response, a spokesperson for Buckingham Palace stated: "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion." Article continues below According to Royal sources, it would have been constitutionally improper for the monarch to intervene while the matter was under government consideration and court review.