This article is exclusively available for Business Insider subscribers. If you haven't yet subscribed, consider becoming an Insider to access this content and much more.

In the heart of Silicon Valley, a significant cultural transformation is underway in the tech sector. The prevailing message among industry titans is unmistakable: the days of generous perks coupled with minimal accountability are fading into the past.

Big Tech companies are now adopting a cultural reset that intertwines ample rewards for high-performing employeesoften referred to as the "carrots"with increasingly stringent consequences for those who fail to meet expectations, known as the "sticks." This dual approach reflects a broader shift in the industry towards leaner, more demanding workplaces.

At major players like Google, Microsoft, and Meta, performance management has evolved into a tool for both incentivizing excellence and filtering out underperformance. This transformation is indicative of an industry-wide move towards a more intense and competitive work environment.

Google: Enhancing Rewards for Top Performers

Recently reported by my colleague Hugh Langley, Google is actively encouraging its employees to elevate their performance by enhancing the rewards for its most outstanding contributors. The tech giant has revamped its performance review system to allow a larger pool of employees to achieve higher performance ratings, which now come with increased bonuses and equity grants. This strategic change aims to motivate employees to strive for excellence.

However, these new financial incentives are described as "budget-neutral," meaning that while high performers will see increased rewards, these will be offset by reduced bonuses for those rated in the lower tiers. This policy reinforces the companys commitment to fostering a culture of excellence, while also imposing consequences for employees who may be content to merely maintain their current positions.

Microsoft: A Firm Stance on Underperformance

On the other hand, Microsoft is implementing a more aggressive approach to managing underperformance. The company has introduced a policy that requires underperforming employees to make a critical choice: they can opt for a 16-week severance payout to leave the company voluntarily, or they can enter a formal performance improvement plan (PIP) that sets clear expectations and deadlines for improvement.

Employees who choose to participate in the PIP and subsequently fail to meet the outlined criteria risk termination without severance pay and will face a two-year ban on reemployment at Microsoft. This strategy mirrors Amazon's controversial "Pivot" program and highlights Microsoft's effort to eliminate any ambiguity surrounding performance standards. Earlier this year, Microsoft laid off approximately 2,000 employees classified as low performers, doing so without offering severance packages, thereby reinforcing its commitment to a no-nonsense approach to workforce management.

Meta: Embracing Performance-Based Layoffs

Meta has also adopted a policy of performance-based layoffs, aligning with the trend seen across the tech industry. The companys rigorous review process aims to terminate around 5% of its workforce, specifically targeting those identified as the lowest performers. An internal memo, which was obtained by Business Insider earlier this year, indicated that Meta is considering making performance-based layoffs an annual practice under a strategy termed "non-regrettable attrition."

Adding further complexity to this situation is Metas implementation of internal "block lists," which prevent certain former employees from being rehired. This includes even high-performing individuals who were laid off in previous rounds, leaving many perplexed, especially when they have received endorsements from hiring managers seeking to bring them back.

A Broader Shift: Pressure Over Perks

These developments reflect a significant cultural recalibration within the tech industry. As investments in artificial intelligence ramp up and as Wall Street pressures firms for greater efficiency, companies are increasingly urging employees to "do more with less." Tech leaders from Google to Meta are explicitly linking success to heightened intensity and uncompromising execution. Performance ratings have transitioned from being mere checkpoints in ones career to pivotal determinants of job security and career advancement.

While the "carrots" for top-tier employees are more lucrative than ever, the "sticks"or consequences for failureare becoming sharper and more frequent, often resulting in finality for those who do not meet the rising expectations.